By:
Conor Martin
Peter Canavan has ruled himself out of any involvement in a newly proposed Gaelic football ‘Expert Advisory Group’.
The GAA star-turned-GAA pundit insisted he has no appetite for a return to committee work despite his recent role on the Football Review Committee (FRC).
The Tyrone great may have helped shape the latest wave of reforms, but for him, that chapter is now firmly closed.
Canavan joined Jim Gavin’s FRC last year alongside former inter-county referee Maurice Deegan, stepping in after Malachy O’Rourke and Michael Murphy exited the panel.
Both departed for very different reasons. O’Rourke took up the Tyrone managerial post, while Murphy staged a high-profile return from retirement and led Donegal on a stirring run to the 2025 All-Ireland final with the Ulster champions as they came up short against a rampant Kerry team.
GAA still coping with FRC rule changes
The FRC completed its work in September, delivering a final report that laid out a series of rule changes aimed at modernising the game.
Those proposals were rubber-stamped at Special Congress the following month, formally bringing the committee to an end. However, the reforms came with a clear caveat: a new monitoring body would be established to keep tabs on how the changes play out in practice.
That group now appears close to becoming a reality, with early discussion likely to centre on the controversy surrounding the revised hooter rule and its impact on match endings, highlighted last weekend with Tomás Kennedy’s winning score for Kerry against Roscommon
Peter Canavan wants no part of GAA Expert Advisory Group
Despite that, Canavan has made it clear he will not be lending his voice to the process. While he accepts that further tweaks to the rules are inevitable as the game evolves, the former Footballer of the Year is content to watch developments unfold from a distance rather than return to the boardroom and said: “No, I wouldn’t have a desire to be part of a new committee
“There’s plenty of experts in the country, so they won’t have to go too far to get experts and people who get the game.
“I was more than happy to oblige and work with some brilliant men on the Football Review Committee. Despite the fact there was a consensus, everybody in that committee had their own views and their own opinions.
“It was very well managed and very well led by Jim Gavin. By and large, I think there are bits and pieces about different rules that people might not be happy with, but overall, it’s been for the betterment of our game.
“Moving forward, it’s inevitable that there’ll be tweaks made to the rules. As players and coaches adapt to the current set of rules, the game could go in a different direction. Patterns of play could be established that are not conducive to good football or good viewing, and then something has to be done about it.
“So you’d be foolish if you didn’t have a group in place to monitor how the game is going. We’ll just see how the year progresses, and there could well be changes come next year. I fully understand why it’s there. “If done properly, it should work, but you’ve got to have a lot of things in place for that to happen, and clearly at the minute that’s not the case.”
Categories
- Athletics (5)
- Aussie Rules (1)
- Basketball (12)
- Camogie (3)
- College American football (1)
- Combat (185)
- Cricket (17)
- Cycling (4)
- Darts (36)
- Editors-picks (13)
- Football (1210)
- Formula-1 (14)
- GAA (308)
- Golf (162)
- Hockey (1)
- Horse Racing (172)
- interviews (3)
- LGFA (3)
- MLB Baseball (2)
- NFL (23)
- ROI Radar (1)
- Rowing (1)
- Rugby (188)
- Snooker (6)
- Swimming (3)
- Tennis (17)
- Uncategorized (17)
- WWE (1)
